As relações institucionais na aprovação anual da proposta orçamentária em nível federal: um estudo comparado entre o Brasil e o México
Visualizar/ Abrir
Data
2018-03-15Autor
Oliveira, Carla Patricia Mania de
Metadata
Mostrar registro completoResumo
The present work is a comparative study between Brazil and Mexico, at a Federal
Level, approaching the institutional relations in the coalition government during the annual
budget cycle stage aiming at evaluating of proposals for public resource allocation.
The scope leads this studies to an analysis of Executive Branch and Legislative
Power interactions in the decision -making process of budget arena and mutual influence in the
definition of annual public spending by modifying the initial proposal, amending and approving
it.
This stage involves a complex political negotiation where the participants have
distinct incentives and they aim determine budgetary initiatives which will deserve the
resources allocation to the detriment of other possibilities.
The aim is to understand institutional relationship, limits of the activities,
incentives of participants and the boundaries of inter-party and inter-institutional cooperation
which leads to approval of budget proposal.
In this way, this research makes a review of the institutional condition and the
structure of budgetary institutions of each country, a systematic analysis of the organization and
transparence , dynamics of the decisions, competences and prerogatives of participants, the
extent of decision makers, external sources of pressure, structure of public spending, the
constraints on resource allocation an re-allocation and the dimensions actually available for
change.
The research is carried out through a bibliographic and documentary procedure,
with a qualitative approach, exploratory descriptive objective from a comparative perspective
of Brazilian and Mexican institutional scenarios from 1988 and 1997, respectively.