As mudanças nas leis florestais e a quantificação de serviços ecossistêmicos em microbacias rurais
Abstract
The demand for information about resources quantity and quality of a watershed, and how
these resources are related with riparian forests, restoration, farming and Ecosystem Services
(ES) production, are very debated nowadays. Thus, the determination of factors that directly
and indirectly affect the quality and quantity of these resources, and how it affects the landscape
dynamic, must be studied for a better balance between agriculture and environment. The
objective of this study is quantify the potential of ES production related to soil conservation
and carbon stock in different forest restoration scenarios and the adoptions of soil conservation
practices in agriculture areas. Two micro watersheds were studied: Posses (Extrema – MG) and
Ribeirão Vermelho (São Pedro – SP). Three scenarios were considered: the current land use
and soil cover, the old Forest Code (1965 – scenario I), and the Native Vegetation Protection
Law (NVPL, 2012 – scenario II). The metrics used in this evaluation were soil loss, soil
retention and sedimentation. Carbon stock was estimated for current forest cover, for
restoration areas and for the others current land covers and uses. To evaluate the soil
conservation and agricultural practices were simulated different scenarios with and without
conservation practices and different riparian forest protection buffers. Regarding the current
scenario, the NVPL will increase the forest cover, decrease sedimentation, soil loss and
increase the carbon stock for the Posses and Ribeirão Vermelho micro watersheds. It was
verified that the a bigger forest cover (scenario I), provides less soil loss and less sediment that
reaches the waterways when compared to landscapes with lower amount of native vegetation
(scenario II). Therefore, the NVPL will reduce the area to be restored, the potential of recovery
of forest cover and the ES production related with soil conservation in the micro watersheds
studied compared to what would be obtained with the old forest code. In addition, the
conservation practices adoption, with and without, influenced soil loss and sedimentation more
than the riparian vegetation buffers, evidencing the importance of the adoption of good
agricultural practices within the concept of forest restoration and landscape.