Regularização fundiária na cidade de Piracicaba-SP: ações e conflitos
![Thumbnail](/bitstream/handle/ufscar/4394/DissSMMF.pdf.jpg?sequence=2&isAllowed=y)
Visualizar/ Abrir
Data
2005-04-06Autor
Funes, Silvia Maria Morales
Metadata
Mostrar registro completoResumo
This work treats the issue of the land regularization of shantytowns, which,
analyzed as a wider subject, also includes urban and juridical interventions. This
research focused on the difficulties found in the development and conclusion of the
land regularization legal processes, specially the juridical matter, in other words,
the possession or property of the land, which the occupants demand so much. For
an empirical approach, we studied Piracicaba, a town in the state of São Paulo,
Brazil. On the subject of shantytowns, Piracicaba is different from most of the
average sized towns in the country, both in quantity and urban location. While most
of them have around 20% of their populations living in shanty towns, precarious
urban outline and lack of infra-structure, the population that lives in shanty towns in
Piracicaba is 5%, most of their nuclei present a reasonable urban outline and, at
least, they have access to basic infra-structure. The hypothesis that led the
research was that the legal processes of land regularization in shanty towns in
Piracicaba were not concluded because of the absence of an inhabitation public
policy, that included the land regularization, in which conditioning factors for the
formulation and implementation of the legal processes are essentially the
elaboration and materialization of the legislation, the existence of institutional
stability, the continuance of administrative actions when there is a change in the
government, financial viability, and the necessity of the participation of the
population. To verify the hypothesis, we have picked, as studies of cases, three
nuclei of shantytowns, among the fourty existent in Piracicaba, verifying the
evidences that occurred in each regularization legal process that intercepted their
conclusions. The period of analysis happens from the beginning of 1991 to the end
of 2004. The methodology included bibliographical revision of the literature and the
study of the legislation related to the subject, the documental analysis of the
empirical processes found in the municipal bodies, interviews, the elaboration of a
chart showing the evidences that happened in the three legal processes that were
studied, and the organization and analysis of the information obtained for the
hypothesis verification. At the end, we present the final considerations, showing
that the initial hypothesis was confirmed.