Shoulder Impingement : Short-term effects of a thoracic spine manipulation and a systematic review of physical therapy strategies
Resumo
Background: Shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS) is a common cause of shoulder pain
complains and numerous treatment strategies are available in the clinic. Questions remain
regarding the effects of Thoracic Spinal Manipulation (TSM) on SIS and concerning the efficacy
of available techniques on the treatment of this population.
Objectives: In a clinical trial, the objective was to evaluate short-term effects of a TSM on pain,
function, scapular kinematics and scapular muscle activity in individuals with SIS. In a
systematic review, the objective was to summarize current evidence regarding effectiveness of
physical therapy to improve pain, function and range of motion in this population.
Methods: In the clinical trial, participants were randomly allocated to TSM group (n=30) or
sham-TSM group (n=31) and attended 2 intervention sessions over a 1-week period. Shoulder
pain, shoulder function (DASH and WORC questionnaires), scapular kinematics and scapular
muscle activity were measured. A blinded assessor evaluated the outcomes at day 1, day 2-pre,
day 2-post and day 3. In the review, Pubmed, Web of Science, CINAHL Cochrane, Embase,
Lilacs, Ibecs and Scielo databases were searched up to April 2015. Randomized controlled trials
investigating different modalities of physical therapy in the treatment of patients with SIS on
pain, function/disability or range of motion were included.
Results: In the clinical trial, TSM group improved pain (1.1 points) and tended to improve
function (5.0 points on WORC) over the sham-TSM group after 2 intervention sessions. Scapular
upward rotation increased 4.0°, 5.3° and 3.3° at day 2-pre, day 2-post and day 3, respectively, in
the TSM group during lowering of the arm. Changes in scapular internal rotation and tilt were
not different between groups. Upper and lower trapezius activity decreased in the TSM group
and both groups, respectively, during elevation and lowering of the arm. Serratus anterior
activity increased in the sham-TSM group. In the review, sixty-two RCTs were included. The
majority had a low to moderate risk of bias. Exercise therapy provided high evidence of
improvements to the treatment in the short, mid or long-term. Dynamic humeral centering,
proprioceptive exercises and manual therapy associated with conventional exercises enhance the
improvements in the short-term. Low-level laser, ultrasound, pulsed electromagnetic field and
kinesio taping provided moderate and high evidence level towards no benefits to the treatment of
SIS. Microwave diathermy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and isolated manual
therapy or acupuncture provided limited evidence of benefits.
Conclusion: TSM may be worthy to achieve short-term reduction of shoulder pain, increase of
scapular upward rotation and decrease of upper trapezius activity facilitating the application of
other movement-based interventions in individuals with SIS. Exercise therapy should be used as
the first choice to improve pain, function and range of motion, and the association of manual
therapy should be the best choice to accelerate symptoms decrease and progress exercise therapy
quickly. Low-level laser therapy, ultrasound, pulsed electromagnetic field and kinesio taping do
not provide significant effects to the therapy and therefore could be avoided. More studies are
necessary to improve evidence concerning effects of diacutaneous fibrolysis, microwave
diathermy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, acupuncture and isolated manual therapy
techniques in the treatment of SIS.