Logo do repositório
Comunidades e Coleções
Todo o repositório
Estatísticas
Sobre
English
العربية
বাংলা
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
Gàidhlig
ગુજરાતી
हिंदी
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
Latviešu
मराठी
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Português do Brasil
Русский
Srpski (lat)
Српски
Svenska
Türkçe
Yкраї́нська
Tiếng Việt
Esqueceu sua senha?
  1. Início
  2. Pesquisar por Data

Navegando por Data de Publicação, começando com "2017-09-18"

Filtrar resultados por ano ou mês
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Resultados por página
  • Opções de Ordenação
  • Carregando...
    Imagem de Miniatura
    listelement.badge.dso-typeItem,
    Estimação de funções do redshift de galáxias com base em dados fotométricos
    (Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2017-09-18) Ferreira, Gretta Rossi; Izbicki, Rafael; https://lattes.cnpq.br/9991192137633896; https://lattes.cnpq.br/4529763108510595
    In a substantial amount of astronomy problems, we are interested in estimating values assumed of some unknown quantity z ∈ R, for many function g, based on covariates x ∈ R^d. This is made using a sample (X1,Z1), ... ,(Xn,Zn). Two approaches that are usually used to solve this problem consist in (1) estimating a regression function of Z in x and plugging it into the g or (2) estimating a conditional density f(z|x) and plugging it into integral of g(z)f(z|x)dz. Unfortunately, few studies exhibit quantitative comparisons between these two approaches. Besides that, few conditional density estimation methods had their performance compared in these problems. In view of this, the objective of this work is to show several comparisons of techniques used to estimate functions of unknown quantity. In particular we highlight nonparametric methods. In addition to estimators (1) and (2), we also propose a new approach that consists in directly estimating the regression function from g (Z) on x . These approaches were tested in different functions in the DEEP2 and Sheldon 2012 datasets. For almost all the functions tested, the estimator (1) obtained the worst results, except when we use the random forests methods. In several cases, the proposed new approach presented better results, as well as the estimator (2). In particular, we verified that random forests methods generally present to good results.
Siga as redes sociais do SIBi
Contato

Repositório Institucional da UFSCar (RI UFSCar)

Av. Biblioteca Comunitária, Campus São Carlos

Rod. Washington Luís, km 235 - SP-310

São Carlos, SP, 13565-905 (16) 3351-8477

Email: repositorio@ufscar.br

Acessos ao repositorio.ufscar.br

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Acessibilidade
  • Política de Privacidade
  • Termos de Uso
  • Enviar uma Sugestão